Here we are at the end of another month, so I thought it was probably time for a post.
The weather’s changing. Yesterday was the last of the cold November rain – the month’s relentless wind and water have chilled the leaves off the branches and chased the animals to warmer places. The sky’s darkened to its winter hue, a pale ash tint above receding light, a color just before snowfall. The wind is growing fierce and shaking the remaining brittle leaves.
I’ve grown leery of the weather report (terrible habit, I know shouldn’t be so skeptical) – it was supposed to be in the 50’s today, but I soon discovered that my new coat is much too light for this drastic temperature shift. I half-expect light flurries of flakes soon, but the weather isn’t as predictable as it is up north. Seasonal transitions don’t seem to exist here. Summers last much longer than they’re supposed to while spring and fall are delayed or seem to meld into summer – oh, and the winters are pretty schizophrenic.
It’s quite easy for you to lose your bearings, making you feel disoriented and out of place. Perhaps that’s the problem with this place that makes so many people want to leave – actually there are a number of things but that’s much too long of a list for this post. There’s value in having a sense of time and place (cue the Byrds song now), and we’ve all seen enough Hollywood movies to know what happens when we go messing with nature.
At least I think that was the obvious moral of the movie Splice, which I saw last week and intended to post this commentary soon after (of course as a committed procrastinator, my posting is late). I actually had pretty high hopes for this movie when I had seen the teasers. Particularly when Sarah Polley is playing lead – she’s general the critic’s darling and I really liked her direction of Away from Her. There have been few movies that I didn’t like her in – yes, I know it seems illogical that my skepticism about the weather doesn’t extend to Hollywood, right?
Alas, Splice is my comeuppance for being complacent. Again, there were so many problems with this film and mine was primarily its forced narrative. I really liked the concept: society’s contemporary fear and obsession with creation realized through the feminine fears of motherhood. (Who knew that the feminist gothic literature class would come in handy, right?) This fear manifests as Elsa’s fear of losing control, but rather than focusing on a character study and allowing the story to unfold naturally, the story is rushed. You only know about her fear because you’re continually reminded of it through the other cool character’s needless expository dialogue. I won’t bore you with how much I loathed being reminded about how cool the characters were. Suspension of disbelief is one thing but…really? Wired magazine, ugly hipster car? I’m guessing that I’m not cool enough to appreciate it. Pearls before swine.
I really wanted to like this film, but I really don’t think it knew what it wanted to be: hipster sci-fi thriller (is there such a thing?), a modern appropriation of Frankenstein (obvious failure), a character study of our moral choices (way off) or just a plain horror flick (scary that I’m writing so much about it). Even if Polley’s character was supposed to be a female gothic archetype, there were better movies that are along the same vein. For some reason, I think that Spanish films seem to better capture these classic Gothic themes with more complex female roles like Guillermo del Toro’s works, The Orphanage, House of Voices (though not so much and is French). I take that back, The Others was well done.
Granted that Splice is more sci-fi than gothic, but they share the same classic themes just not the same attention to character and story development. The movie’s ending was forced with no real resolution in my opinion, perhaps there’s hope for a sequel? I’m not sure if skepticism or cynicism is the appropriate response.
All in all, I’m sure I’m giving this film much more credit than it deserves. However, but I’m really trying to understand why Polley took on this role. The concept had potential but in the end the forced and rushed narrative produced a rather mediocre movie that came off shallow and schizophrenic.
So, now back to square one, and the moral of the story is? Yes, don’t mess with the natural flow of things – especially when writing and producing a cohesive narrative. Now only if I had a superfluous hipster scientist exposing that to me daily, I’d be golden with these posts (typos, comma splices, etc.).

November’s gone.